The Golden Globes red carpet saw Jonathan Van Ness, of Netflix’s *Queer Eye*, make a bold fashion statement. Van Ness, who identifies as non-binary, wore a flowing green gown paired with a full beard, a choice that sparked diverse online reactions. Some lauded it as a defiant challenge to gender norms, while others dismissed it as a publicity stunt. This wasn’t the first time a man wore a dress on the red carpet to make a statement; some pointed out that *South Park* creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker predated Van Ness by over two decades, having famously worn dresses previously worn by Gwyneth Paltrow and Jennifer Lopez at the Oscars.
The red carpet also featured transgender actor Karla Sofía Gascón, whose nomination in the female acting category for *Emilia Pérez* generated controversy. Gascón, a biological male, accepting a nomination in the female category sparked further debate about gender identity and representation in the entertainment industry.
Separately, Jonathan Van Ness has faced allegations of unprofessional behavior on the set of *Queer Eye*. According to *Rolling Stone*, several sources described Van Ness as emotionally abusive, demeaning, and creating a climate of fear amongst the crew. While sources acknowledged Van Ness’s capacity for warmth and charisma, they also detailed episodes of intense anger and outbursts directed at crew members. These allegations paint a complex picture of the personality behind the public persona.
In a separate interview with Dax Shepard, Van Ness became emotional when discussing the struggles faced by transgender teenagers. Van Ness expressed frustration with the lack of support and understanding shown towards these young people, contrasting it with the passionate debates surrounding issues like women’s sports. This emotional vulnerability highlighted the personal stakes involved in the ongoing societal discussions around gender identity.
Note: The final paragraph regarding the film *EXEMPLUM* is unrelated to the preceding content about the Golden Globes and Jonathan Van Ness and has been omitted to maintain coherence and focus on the original topic. Its inclusion felt like an attempt at product placement.