Illinois lawmakers are poised to consider legalizing internet casino gambling in the upcoming legislative session. This move would mark the latest expansion of gambling in a state already saturated with options, from racetracks and riverboat casinos to the ubiquitous video gaming terminals found in bars and restaurants across Illinois. The proliferation of mobile sports betting has already brought gambling to nearly everyone’s fingertips, and iGaming would represent the next frontier – bringing regulated online slots, blackjack, poker, and other games directly to mobile devices.
Gaming interests are expected to aggressively lobby for the legalization of iGaming, anticipating significant revenue generation for the state. Proponents estimate the state could gain $450 million in tax revenue within the first year, potentially reaching $800 million annually. This potential windfall is particularly appealing given the state’s estimated $3 billion budget shortfall. State Senator Cristina Castro, a Democrat who has previously introduced iGaming bills, highlights the potential for increased revenue and public acceptance as key arguments in favor.
However, the proposal faces strong opposition. Critics, including State Representative John Cabello, argue that iGaming would cannibalize existing businesses reliant on in-person gambling, such as bars and restaurants with video gaming terminals. They contend that allowing home-based gambling would divert revenue away from these establishments, potentially leading to significant financial losses and job reductions. The Illinois Licensed Beverage Association estimates that some businesses could see a 40% revenue drop. This concern is amplified by the fact that a substantial portion of video gaming revenue currently benefits out-of-state corporations, rather than local businesses and governments. The absence of video gaming in Chicago further exacerbates this issue, with Cabello calling the city’s omission “absolutely, positively stupid.”
Beyond financial concerns, opponents raise serious public health implications. Les Bernal, national director of Stop Predatory Gambling, describes iGaming as “gambling fentanyl,” arguing that widespread access through smartphones will dramatically increase gambling addiction rates. While supporters point to the potential for in-app wagering limits and increased funding for addiction treatment, critics argue these measures are insufficient to offset the potential harm. A 2021 state study revealed that a significant portion of the Illinois adult population either has a gambling problem or is at risk of developing one.
Governor JB Pritzker has called the idea “worthy of consideration,” and his administration, which has overseen a substantial expansion of gambling in recent years, is currently drafting its budget proposal. Meanwhile, major gambling companies like DraftKings and FanDuel, having previously clashed with the state over tax rates, are now actively pushing for iGaming legalization. They argue that online gamblers represent a distinct demographic and that iGaming would not significantly impact other gambling sectors. However, the debate remains intense, with the outcome uncertain as the new General Assembly convenes in January and negotiations unfold through May.